Tulelake, CA— Editorial: Letter of the Law
There seems to be a "Chief of Police" in Tulelake who seems to think that not only is he the ONLY law enforcement in the City of Tulelake. He also believes he has a shingle outside the Tulelake Police Department that says, "ATTORNEY AT LAW”.
Related link: Tuesday, August 12, 2014
UPDATED AGAIN: Enough already with the BS in Tulelake
Tulelake, CA— Editorial: Setting the record straight
Where he takes it upon himself to give out legal advice, when he does not have the law degree to back up the legal advice he gives out FREELY to so many of Tulelake residences and citizens. He even passes on information that no one should have known, accept the arresting officer, illegal again. He even passes documents that have not been legally obtained, except by way of a subpoena in the proper court or county. Where also there is no record of one being issued for those very records that were claimed were public records on record in a court of law. Not by one but by two people on record. Then, these people claim they got it from public records in Alturas, CA. Not possible.
Not possible, unless they were passed illegally to the parties who claimed on record they were public records. There is only one of several ways those records or information was passed to those individuals and that was by a person who had access or was given access by yet another individual that did not have a legal right to pass them on either to anyone.
All of this soon will come about in the right venue and place before the courts. Where when the time comes will be subpoenaed along with the witnesses from both sides as soon as the depositions are taken. Which, it seems the court has not allowed that due process to take place just yet.
I wonder why? What has been the delay? It surely in not on the part of the defendant who has yet to receive proper discovery? Which, again by law is entitled too and another reason for a legal reason for an appeal to be filed at the right time and place, soon. Along with the Grand Jury who has not been contacted yet before a complaint goes to the Attorney General of the State of California. Where all remedies have to take place at the local level first.
There is also questionable funds that are being administered by Tony Ross the “Chief of Police” where apparently there are no checks and balances when it comes to verifying their income. A Red Cross voucher was issued for $75.00 at Jock’s Market. Where the boyfriend/husband works for TID and they receive a monthly check for an adopted Child and this person works for cash and does not declare her cash income but instead receives it under the table as "Cash". Yet they both bring in $3,000.00 a month in income and yet cannot pay their bills and need a Red Cross voulture?. Maybe Tony Ross is playing favorites again and an investigation is in-order for the favoritism once again by this so-called phony Chief of Police. Who refers to his wife Leah Ross at the most recent Tulelake City Council meeting and there was no slip of the tong, because if that were the case it would have been corrected then. Not now, when it has been brought to their attention and written about it.
Have you seen those bushes at the Tulelake Post Office the last I heard it is suppose to be possible to jump out of those bushes there by possibly the same people that most recently received a Red Cross Voucher from their good friend Tony Ross, the Chief of Police of Tulelake, CA?
One of the above was also seen pushing an elderly man down Fourth Street in an area they had no business being in where I live and "if" that would have been me, I would have been arrested. You bet your bottom dollar I would have been arrested. The same way they were driving down Fourth Street by where I live and yet they were not arrested for that either, Mr Ross. Isn't that what you claimed with a most recent meeting you and I along with another witnesses were ordered to your office to discuss my doctors appointment. Then you went off track and mentioned something you should have kept to yourself, as now it will be used in court against you and why you did not arrest the parties claiming they were on Fourth Street by my apartments Mr. Ross. It works both ways, it is not a one way street that you and others you are involved with seem to think. It is two way street when it comes to violating restraining orders Mr Ross. Since you claim you are an attorney Mr Ross, maybe you should look it up. Or where the youngest of the clan can mouth off with his buddy as they ride by me on C Street on my way home from the Post Office, but that is OK isn't it Mr Ross.
Well, as they say it is not what you know but whom you know and who will look the other way if you are on the right side of the Chief of Police, Tony Ross. But those of us who are on the wrong side are the ones that get falsely arrested due to fact that this Chief of Police also cannot handle the TRUTH EITHER.
The same Chief of Police who’s supposed divorced wife has the liquor license, yet they live and resided at the same address. I do not know too many people who get divorces and then still live in the same house and go to church as husband and wife. Do you? Only Tulelake, CA can people like that get away with it, because as they say. Well, what do you expect, “That’s Tulelake.” Is it? Really? Not any more!
I don’t play favorites and I do not care whom you or what you may or may have not done for me in the present or in the past. What is right, is right and what is wrong is wrong and I will speak out against it or write about it till the day I die as I live in Tulelake, CA. I am not going any where any time soon, but I know a few people that will be unless they start admitting the truth now, before the truth can no longer save them from the bed they made and the one they soon will find themselves sleeping in where they have no keys but the jailer will and does.
Karma is a bitch and you reap what you sow.
Stay tuned for the next continuing chapter of as “Tulelake Turns!” Witness fees: Attn: Tony Ross §382. Witness Fees.
(a) Witnesses subpoenaed for any deposition or hearing are entitled to the following fees and mileage, payable in advance:
(1) Witness fee for each day's actual attendance of thirty-five dollars ($35);
(2) Mileage actually traveled, both ways, of twenty cents ($.20) a mile;
(b) A party who subpoenas a peace officer as listed at Government Code Section 68097.1 shall reimburse the public entity for the full cost to the public entity incurred in paying the officer his salary or other compensation and traveling expenses for each day that such officer is required to remain in attendance. The amount of one hundred and fifty dollars ($150), together with the subpoena, shall be tendered to the person accepting the subpoena for each day that the officer is required to remain in attendance pursuant to the subpoena. If the actual expenses should later prove to be less than the amount tendered, the difference shall be refunded; or if the actual expenses should later prove to be more than the amount tendered, the difference shall be paid to the public entity by the party at whose request the subpoena was issued.
UPDATE: There is a meeting taking place at the Tulelake Police Department with the Chief of Police, Tony Ross and numerous other cars parked out side the city of Tulelake Police Department and to my knowledge the acting Mayor was not notified of the meeting. Is this meeting taking place on City of Tulelake payroll for the Chief of Police or is he holding meeting on his own personal time. After all he is paid by the hour and is not on salary. So who gets charged for the time, the city of Tulelake or does this come out of his budget.
What was the purpose for this meeting using a city of Tulelake Building, regardless if it is the Tulelake police department or not. The pubic has a right to know when city building is being used for public meetings and if it were a private one. Why was or is the Tulelake Police Department being used for this purpose without notifying the proper people in charge of the city of Tulelake or why were they not informed is the question and the right of all the public in Tulelake, not just the ones that were invited to a city of Tulelake Building, Police Department station or not?
Who within the city was notified of this meeting, when and what time were they advised of the use of this building, other than the intended purpose it was designed and budgeted use of said building?
Stay tuned! Witness tampering 18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
Written by James Garland of Tulelake News
PO Box 772
Tulelake, CA 96134-0772
Home Phone (530) 667-4744
Cell # (530) 708-7852
Comments
Post a Comment