control freaks who seem to think they represent the citizens of Tulelake by their own authority that they have appointed to themselves by no one else’s authority but their own and seem to think they have the right to remove other people’s stuff from the Post Office as well like they do. Why? Because they are trying to keep the truth from getting out. And yet, claim they are the ones being harassed in a court of law. BS and they know it.

Karma is a Bitch!

"What comes around goes around"

Then at a city council meeting have a person on record state that he will guarantee that the Chief of Police will do a non-bias investigation against a report, where it was requested that an independent investigator be brought in and where it was pointed out there is no city policy to investigate the Chief of Police for wrongdoing.

It is time there be one, starting NOW!

No private citizen can guarantee that the Chief of Police will do a non-bias investigation. I don’t know who they think they are, but no one can guarantee what another person will do. Where that statement was made at a city council meeting, on record, it is ridiculous, and they know it. To also to be used in court, as a public record, at a public meeting and the statement made there; including the one on July 21, 2014, and what was said then and by whom!!!

While my valuable time is being taken away for a bunch of nonsense and they know it. But I am the one who has been claimed to be doing the harassment by a group of people that keep harassing me for STANDING UP AND TELLING THE truth THEY CANNOT HANDLE. To the point I have their DNA on flyers they wrote all over my articles I posted at the Post Office. Four of them, to be exact to also be presented in court! Along with how many times they removed my articles from the Post Office in Tulelake, CA and how many times I had to replace them again, sometimes every two hours. Documented at exactly who they are and the time they did it.

While being threatened at a city council meeting on record by a past former mayor, on record at a city council meeting. And by using the word “if” and that is supposed to be acceptable and condoned. Which, that record will be presented in court at trial, set for September in Yreka, CA. Where a hearing on a complaint that was filed with the city council was held at a city council meeting and without proper legal notification was held to protect the rights of the Chief of Police as he claimed the policeman's bill of rights as his defense. While a witness spoke against me at a city council meeting that made statements that I was not there to refute. I was not notified at all about the hearing taking place at a city council meeting because the Chief of Police stated on record he knew where I was when he proceeded without my presence because he knew I was dealing with other things in Yreka, CA at the time of

To be continued